← News Topics

Why Would Parents Give Up Their Babies?

Day 2

親はなぜ赤ちゃんを手放すのか

Modest home interior suggesting poverty and difficult family choices

At first glance, baby trafficking seems impossible to understand. Many people immediately ask, “How could any parent sell a child?” However, investigators in Indonesia say the reality is often far more complicated. While trafficking is unquestionably a serious crime, the circumstances that make families vulnerable are usually rooted in poverty, social pressure, and limited opportunities rather than simple greed.

一見すると、赤ちゃんの人身売買は理解できないように思えます。多くの人はすぐに「親がどうして子どもを売れるのか」と尋ねます。しかしインドネシアの捜査官は、現実はしばしばはるかに複雑だと言います。人身売買は疑いなく深刻な犯罪ですが、家族を脆弱にする状況は、単純な欲望よりも、貧困、社会的圧力、限られた機会に根ざしていることが通常です。

In many of the cases examined by Indonesian authorities, brokers targeted parents experiencing severe financial hardship. Some mothers were told that wealthier families could provide their babies with better opportunities. Others were offered financial assistance during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. To families struggling to meet their basic needs, such proposals could be presented not as the sale of a child, but as a chance to secure the child’s future.

インドネシア当局が調べた多くの事例では、仲介者は深刻な経済的困窮を経験している親を標的にしました。一部の母親には、より裕福な家族が赤ちゃんにより良い機会を与えられると言われました。他の人々には、妊娠中や出産直後に金銭的援助が提示されました。基本的なニーズを満たすのに苦しむ家族にとって、そのような提案は子どもの売却としてではなく、子どもの将来を確保する機会として示されることがありました。

The investigation also highlighted an important cultural distinction. In some parts of Indonesia, it is relatively common for children to be raised by members of their extended family when their parents cannot care for them. This practice, known as kinship care, may involve grandparents, aunts, uncles, or older siblings. It is generally intended to keep children within a familiar family network rather than separate them from it permanently.

捜査はまた、重要な文化的区別を浮き彫りにしました。インドネシアの一部では、親が世話できないとき、子どもが拡大家族のメンバーに育てられることが比較的一般的です。親族養育として知られるこの慣行には、祖父母、叔母、叔父、兄姉が関わることがあります。一般に、子どもを家族ネットワークから永久に切り離すのではなく、なじみのある家族ネットワークの中にとどめることを意図しています。

However, criminal groups can exploit that tradition. Brokers may describe an illegal transfer as an ordinary family arrangement or claim that a child will simply be cared for by someone with greater financial resources. When strangers, payments, forged documents, and permanent separation become involved, the boundary between support and trafficking becomes much harder to identify. Criminal networks may deliberately blur the line between culturally accepted care and the commercial transfer of a child.

しかし、犯罪グループはその伝統を悪用できます。仲介者は違法な譲渡を普通の家族の取り決めとして説明したり、子どもは単により大きな経済力を持つ誰かに世話されると主張したりすることがあります。見知らぬ人、支払い、偽造書類、永久的な分離が関わるとき、支援と人身売買の境界は識別しにくくなります。犯罪ネットワークは、文化的に受け入れられたケアと子どもの商業的譲渡の線を故意に曖昧にすることがあります。

The financial imbalance within the trafficking network was especially striking. Court testimony suggested that adoptive families in Singapore sometimes paid tens of thousands of Singapore dollars during the adoption process. By contrast, some biological parents reportedly received only a few hundred US dollars. Most of the money remained with the people who organized the transactions, created false records, and moved the babies across borders.

人身売買ネットワーク内の金銭的不均衡は特に際立っていました。法廷での証言は、シンガポールの養親家族が養子縁組の過程でときとして何万シンガポールドルも支払ったことを示唆しました。対照的に、一部の実の親が受け取ったのはわずか数百米ドルだったと報じられています。お金の大部分は、取引を組織し、偽の記録を作り、赤ちゃんを国境を越えて動かした人々の手に残りました。

Poverty alone, however, cannot fully explain why trafficking occurs. Many families facing serious economic difficulty never consider giving up a child, while others refuse offers made by brokers. Vulnerability may also be influenced by education, access to healthcare, family relationships, and trust in public institutions. Financial pressure can narrow people’s choices, but it does not remove personal agency or make every struggling family equally likely to be exploited.

しかし、貧困だけでは人身売買が起きる理由を完全には説明できません。深刻な経済的困難に直面する多くの家族は子どもを手放すことを決して考えず、仲介者の申し出を拒否する人もいます。脆弱性は、教育、医療へのアクセス、家族関係、公的機関への信頼にも影響されるかもしれません。経済的圧力は人々の選択肢を狭めえますが、個人の主体性を取り除くことも、苦しむすべての家族を等しく搾取されやすくすることもありません。

Social stigma is another important factor. Unmarried mothers, women facing unexpected pregnancies, or families unable to support another child may experience shame or isolation. Without access to counseling, medical care, or financial assistance, they may become easier targets for people promising a quick and confidential solution. Traffickers often take advantage of emotional distress as well as material need.

社会的スティグマも重要な要因です。未婚の母親、予期せぬ妊娠に直面する女性、もう一人の子どもを支えられない家族は、恥や孤立を経験するかもしれません。カウンセリング、医療、金銭的援助にアクセスできなければ、迅速で秘密の解決策を約束する人々の標的になりやすくなります。人身売買業者はしばしば、物質的な必要性だけでなく感情的な苦痛も利用します。

For this reason, arresting traffickers cannot by itself eliminate the problem. Law enforcement is essential, but prevention also requires stronger social services, accessible support for vulnerable parents, and greater transparency in adoption procedures. Governments must address the underlying causes that allow brokers to present illegal transactions as acts of care or opportunity. What appears to be one criminal exchange may have begun with pressures that developed long before the baby was born.

このため、人身売買業者を逮捕するだけでは問題をなくせません。法執行は不可欠ですが、予防にはより強い社会福祉、脆弱な親へのアクセスしやすい支援、養子縁組手続きのより大きな透明性も必要です。政府は、仲介者が違法な取引をケアや機会の行為として提示できるようにする根本原因に対処しなければなりません。一つの犯罪的な交換に見えるものは、赤ちゃんが生まれるずっと前に生まれた圧力から始まったのかもしれません。

Vocabulary

  1. vulnerable — easily harmed, influenced, or exploited because of difficult circumstances. Example: Families without financial or social support may be especially vulnerable to traffickers.
  2. hardship — a condition involving serious difficulty, especially financial difficulty. Example: The family experienced severe hardship after losing its main source of income.
  3. extended family — family members beyond parents and children, such as grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Example: The child was raised by members of her extended family.
  4. kinship care — an arrangement in which a child is cared for by relatives or close family connections rather than by the child’s parents. Example: Kinship care can allow children to remain within their family network.
  5. exploit — to take unfair advantage of a person or situation for personal gain. Example: Criminal groups may exploit parents who feel they have no other options.
  6. blur the line between — to make the difference between two things unclear. Example: Forged adoption documents can blur the line between legal care and trafficking.
  7. social stigma — strong negative attitudes toward a person or situation that may cause shame or exclusion. Example: Social stigma may prevent unmarried mothers from asking for help.
  8. transparency — the quality of being open, clear, and easy to examine. Example: Greater transparency is needed in international adoption procedures.
  9. underlying cause — a deeper or less obvious reason that helps explain why a problem occurs. Example: Poverty may be one underlying cause of trafficking, but it is not the only one.

Comprehension Questions

  1. Why does the article say that the reasons behind baby trafficking are more complicated than they first appear?

    記事は、赤ちゃんの人身売買の背後にある理由が一見するよりも複雑だと言うのはなぜですか?

  2. How did brokers reportedly persuade some biological parents to give up their babies?

    仲介者は、報じられるところでは、どのように一部の実の親に赤ちゃんを手放すよう説得しましたか?

  3. What is kinship care, and why is it culturally different from trafficking?

    親族養育とは何で、文化的に人身売買とどう異なりますか?

  4. How can criminal networks exploit traditional family-care practices?

    犯罪ネットワークは伝統的な家族ケアの慣行をどう悪用できますか?

  5. What does the difference between the amount paid by adoptive families and the amount received by biological parents reveal?

    養親家族が支払った金額と実の親が受け取った金額の違いは何を明らかにしますか?

  6. Why does the article argue that poverty alone cannot explain baby trafficking?

    記事が、貧困だけでは赤ちゃんの人身売買を説明できないと主張するのはなぜですか?

  7. What long-term measures are needed in addition to arresting traffickers?

    人身売買業者の逮捕に加えて、どのような長期的措置が必要ですか?

Discussion Questions

  1. To what extent should financial hardship be considered when judging parents involved in trafficking cases?

    人身売買事件に関与した親を判断するとき、経済的困窮はどの程度考慮されるべきですか?

  2. How can governments support vulnerable parents before criminal networks reach them?

    政府は、犯罪ネットワークが届く前に、脆弱な親をどう支援できますか?

  3. What signs distinguish legitimate kinship care from the illegal transfer of a child?

    正当な親族養育と子どもの違法な譲渡を区別する兆候は何ですか?

  4. Which is likely to prevent trafficking more effectively: harsher punishment or stronger social support? Can either approach succeed alone?

    人身売買をより効果的に防ぐのは、より厳しい処罰ですか、より強い社会支援ですか?どちらか一方だけで成功できますか?

  5. How can social stigma make people more vulnerable to exploitation?

    社会的スティグマは、人々を搾取に対してより脆弱にしうるのはなぜですか?

  6. How can governments respect cultural family practices while ensuring that children are not bought, sold, or permanently separated from their parents without genuine consent?

    政府は、子どもが買われたり売られたり、真の同意なしに親から永久に引き離されたりしないことを確保しつつ、文化的な家族慣行をどう尊重できますか?

Speaking Task

  1. Some people argue: “Baby trafficking is mainly caused by poverty.” Others respond: “Poverty creates vulnerability, but weak institutions, social stigma, and criminal networks are equally important.” Explain which view you find more convincing. In your answer, discuss: financial hardship; kinship care and cultural practices; the role of brokers; social support for parents; and transparency in adoption procedures.

    一部の人は「赤ちゃんの人身売買は主に貧困が原因だ」と主張します。他の人々は「貧困は脆弱性を生むが、弱い制度、社会的スティグマ、犯罪ネットワークも同様に重要だ」と応えます。どちらの見解がより説得力があると思うかを説明してください。答えでは、経済的困窮、親族養育と文化的慣行、仲介者の役割、親への社会的支援、養子縁組手続きの透明性について述べてください。